I just finished a satisfying series of works. These pieces are related in content: they are feminized chairs that cannot accommodate “a seat at the table” and feature a sort of structural reworking necessary because of some people’s cultural predisposition about women. The chairs are redesigned so they can continue to stand after losing a bit of themselves.
The chairs also explore the same materials. The chair backs actually called “splats” are repeated and so are the spindles. Aprons are repeated and featured inside out, with the series of lines showing. They are simple in design and elements and tilt dramatically. The pieces seem to belong together as the fingers on your hand. Similar but different.
The repetition of these elements in several works allows for a deeper exploration of the relationships.
Make no mistake. Even though these works are related, they are strong enough to stand on their own. And for the viewer, seeing a series of works should strengthen the artist’s voice rendering it more understandable.
This is the last in the series. Sadly, I have gone on to examine more visual relationships and more comments on the status of women. This series did present me with problems because they lean so forcefully. We have a tendency to straighten things in our mind, and I was doing that. The chairs were not looking like who they are.
Here is my photo set-up with an infinity wall. See the white edge of the table at the bottom? It is not parallel with the ground here. All I had to do was straighten this edge so it was parallel with the bottom of the image. Then I knew that whatever tilting I was seeing was the correct tilt.